What are vaccine-related deaths, and why are those of COVID-19 shrouded in secrecy<\/strong><\/h4>\nAccording to the World Health Organization<\/a> (WHO), vaccine-related deaths are deaths that occur following the administration of a vaccine but which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the usage of the vaccine. Under recommended conditions, all vaccines are safe and effective if used correctly, but in practice, no vaccine is completely risk-free, and adverse effects can occasionally result after a vaccination.<\/p>\nFor example, in every flu season in America, millions of Americans take influenza vaccines. A relatively small number of people seem to die after taking these vaccines. Although those deaths were painful, the benefits of the influenza vaccination program outweigh the risks because it prevents the disease and the associated deaths.<\/p>\n
In the case of COVID-19, while the vaccines could potentially prevent people from contracting the coronavirus and also facilitate a return to pre-COVID normality for many people, the number of COVID vaccine-related deaths<\/a> has been largely shrouded in secrecy. Many allege that the numbers may be manipulated, making it difficult to know the actual number of people that have died after taking the coronavirus vaccine. In May 2021, Fox News host, Tucker Carlson, warned his viewers<\/a> that the death toll from Covid-19 vaccines may be disconcertingly higher than is officially reported.<\/p>\nCOVID vaccine-related deaths in the US<\/strong><\/h4>\nOn June 24, 2021, LifeSiteNews<\/a> reported that the true number of COVID vaccine-related deaths was probably being altered. According to them, about 5,993 Americans have reportedly died out of 146,171,792 Americans who have been fully vaccinated as of June 11, 2021, based on official data from the Open Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In other words, about four persons died for every 100,000 persons fully vaccinated.<\/p>\nHowever, if you compare the VAERS death rates with COVID vaccination from December 2020 to June 2021, you will notice that the vaccine-related deaths decline just as vaccination rates reach their peak \u2014 which is an anomaly. See the graph below:<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ludci.eu\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Picture1.png?resize=341%2C265&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n
What this implies is that the VAERS death rate started at 18 per 100,000 on the 1st of February but then dropped to around 3.1 per 100,000 by the 1st of June, as in the table below. However, if this remarkable trend was the case, it should have made headlines.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ludci.eu\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Picture2-article.jpg?resize=354%2C223&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n
Instead, LifeSiteNews quoted a Silicon valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch who alleged that the true death count is 25,800 and that the CDC has been \u201creclassifying\u201d most vaccine-related deaths. On analyzing the data from the CDC LifeSiteNews found that the \u201cunclassified\u201d death rate trend \u201ccoincidentally\u201d follows the vaccination trend with remarkable consistency, as you can see in the graph below:<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ludci.eu\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Picture-4-article.png?resize=380%2C247&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n
Their analysis shows that the number of excess \u201cunclassified\u201d deaths from December to June is 32,060, which is comparable to Steve Kirsch\u2019s difference of 25,800 \u2014 note that LifeSiteNews performed their analysis on more recent data. So, if the total number of vaccine-related deaths from December to June is 32,060, the death rate would be 21 per 100,000 fully vaccinated persons, which is comparable to the VAERS death rate of 18 per 100,000 recorded for the beginning of February as in the table above.<\/p>\n
This is more than a coincidence. Even if people reporting these \u201cunclassified\u201d deaths were unsure whether their loved one died from the vaccine and avoided reporting directly to VAERS out of fear of committing the federal crime<\/a> of \u201cfalse reporting\u201d, why has the CDC not noticed this ridiculous trend in \u201cunclassified\u201d death?<\/p>\nReports from other countries<\/strong><\/h4>\nThere have been reports of serious side effects from the vaccine in different parts of the world, such as Norway<\/a>, Portugal<\/a>, Italy<\/a>, Scotland<\/a>, and many other places. It appeared that the dangerous side effects are more common with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is why more than 20 countries<\/a> have revoked their authorizations for the distribution of that vaccine following the public outcry.<\/p>\nThe serious side effects<\/a> are not just about deaths, even though those are the ones that make the headlines. A Norwegian review<\/a> discovered that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was \u201clikely\u201d responsible for the deaths of some elderly patients. In India, a new government report<\/a> acknowledged that three of eight casually assessed cases may have had \u2018consistent\u2019 links to vaccination but concluded otherwise. So far, Canada has reported<\/a> a total of 6207 adverse events following the vaccination.<\/p>\nWhy are the governments COVID vaccine apologists?<\/strong><\/h4>\nOne hardly hears about many of these COVID vaccine-related deaths and side effects from health officials and those in the mainstream media. Perhaps even more concerning than the vaccine is how the media is reporting any concerns about the vaccine. Since the pandemic began, the traditional media have tried to play down these vaccine-related deaths and side effects. Any time someone dies<\/a> after taking the vaccine, or a serious side effect arises, health officials and the media will come out to give a plethora of reasons why taking the vaccine is still the way to go and are nothing to worry about, even while the risk of death and life-changing side effects remain. Their usual slogan is: \u201cNo evidence\u00a0covid-19 vaccines cause death or have serious side effects.\u201d<\/p>\nDespite claims to the contrary, a lot of people have serious concerns about the safety of the vaccine especially with the warp speed with which the vaccines have been developed and distributed. It usually takes more than 10 years<\/a> of research and development before medical professionals declare a vaccine \u2018safe\u2019 for human use. The popular COVID vaccines were developed in less than one year, and vaccines have barely been tested for long-term side effects.<\/p>\nConclusion<\/strong><\/h4>\nWhile the number of COVID vaccine-related deaths are still small compared to the so-called COVID deaths, there should be transparency and consistency in the way data is reported. It is a great disservice to tax-payers to give them false information. Moreover, misrepresenting data to provide a reason and compel people to take the vaccine is a crime against humanity.<\/p>\n
Rather than silent all opposing voices, questions about the short-term and long-term safety of the largest drug trial in history need to be answered. If people are going to be compelled to take the coronavirus vaccine, they have the right to know what the side effects are and the actual risk of death from the vaccine. People have the right to ask governments questions without being censored and silenced.<\/p>\n
We must all stand up to defend our rights to accurate data. We must resist any attempt by any government to hide crucial information from us. Government agencies and health officials owe us a duty to transparency and accurate data so we can make informed decisions about our health!<\/p>\n
Featured Photo by \u00a0Alena Shekhovtcova, <\/a>Pexels<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/h6>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Writes Zeus, Content Writer, Headline Diplomat eMagazine The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020, and on November 09, 2020, Pfizer and Biontech announced that the first set of results from their Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trial provided the initial evidence of our vaccine\u2019s ability to prevent COVID-19. Following that announcement, the US …<\/p>\n
For example, in every flu season in America, millions of Americans take influenza vaccines. A relatively small number of people seem to die after taking these vaccines. Although those deaths were painful, the benefits of the influenza vaccination program outweigh the risks because it prevents the disease and the associated deaths.<\/p>\n
In the case of COVID-19, while the vaccines could potentially prevent people from contracting the coronavirus and also facilitate a return to pre-COVID normality for many people, the number of COVID vaccine-related deaths<\/a> has been largely shrouded in secrecy. Many allege that the numbers may be manipulated, making it difficult to know the actual number of people that have died after taking the coronavirus vaccine. In May 2021, Fox News host, Tucker Carlson, warned his viewers<\/a> that the death toll from Covid-19 vaccines may be disconcertingly higher than is officially reported.<\/p>\n On June 24, 2021, LifeSiteNews<\/a> reported that the true number of COVID vaccine-related deaths was probably being altered. According to them, about 5,993 Americans have reportedly died out of 146,171,792 Americans who have been fully vaccinated as of June 11, 2021, based on official data from the Open Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In other words, about four persons died for every 100,000 persons fully vaccinated.<\/p>\n However, if you compare the VAERS death rates with COVID vaccination from December 2020 to June 2021, you will notice that the vaccine-related deaths decline just as vaccination rates reach their peak \u2014 which is an anomaly. See the graph below:<\/p>\n What this implies is that the VAERS death rate started at 18 per 100,000 on the 1st of February but then dropped to around 3.1 per 100,000 by the 1st of June, as in the table below. However, if this remarkable trend was the case, it should have made headlines.<\/p>\n Instead, LifeSiteNews quoted a Silicon valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch who alleged that the true death count is 25,800 and that the CDC has been \u201creclassifying\u201d most vaccine-related deaths. On analyzing the data from the CDC LifeSiteNews found that the \u201cunclassified\u201d death rate trend \u201ccoincidentally\u201d follows the vaccination trend with remarkable consistency, as you can see in the graph below:<\/p>\n Their analysis shows that the number of excess \u201cunclassified\u201d deaths from December to June is 32,060, which is comparable to Steve Kirsch\u2019s difference of 25,800 \u2014 note that LifeSiteNews performed their analysis on more recent data. So, if the total number of vaccine-related deaths from December to June is 32,060, the death rate would be 21 per 100,000 fully vaccinated persons, which is comparable to the VAERS death rate of 18 per 100,000 recorded for the beginning of February as in the table above.<\/p>\n This is more than a coincidence. Even if people reporting these \u201cunclassified\u201d deaths were unsure whether their loved one died from the vaccine and avoided reporting directly to VAERS out of fear of committing the federal crime<\/a> of \u201cfalse reporting\u201d, why has the CDC not noticed this ridiculous trend in \u201cunclassified\u201d death?<\/p>\n There have been reports of serious side effects from the vaccine in different parts of the world, such as Norway<\/a>, Portugal<\/a>, Italy<\/a>, Scotland<\/a>, and many other places. It appeared that the dangerous side effects are more common with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is why more than 20 countries<\/a> have revoked their authorizations for the distribution of that vaccine following the public outcry.<\/p>\n The serious side effects<\/a> are not just about deaths, even though those are the ones that make the headlines. A Norwegian review<\/a> discovered that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was \u201clikely\u201d responsible for the deaths of some elderly patients. In India, a new government report<\/a> acknowledged that three of eight casually assessed cases may have had \u2018consistent\u2019 links to vaccination but concluded otherwise. So far, Canada has reported<\/a> a total of 6207 adverse events following the vaccination.<\/p>\n One hardly hears about many of these COVID vaccine-related deaths and side effects from health officials and those in the mainstream media. Perhaps even more concerning than the vaccine is how the media is reporting any concerns about the vaccine. Since the pandemic began, the traditional media have tried to play down these vaccine-related deaths and side effects. Any time someone dies<\/a> after taking the vaccine, or a serious side effect arises, health officials and the media will come out to give a plethora of reasons why taking the vaccine is still the way to go and are nothing to worry about, even while the risk of death and life-changing side effects remain. Their usual slogan is: \u201cNo evidence\u00a0covid-19 vaccines cause death or have serious side effects.\u201d<\/p>\n Despite claims to the contrary, a lot of people have serious concerns about the safety of the vaccine especially with the warp speed with which the vaccines have been developed and distributed. It usually takes more than 10 years<\/a> of research and development before medical professionals declare a vaccine \u2018safe\u2019 for human use. The popular COVID vaccines were developed in less than one year, and vaccines have barely been tested for long-term side effects.<\/p>\n While the number of COVID vaccine-related deaths are still small compared to the so-called COVID deaths, there should be transparency and consistency in the way data is reported. It is a great disservice to tax-payers to give them false information. Moreover, misrepresenting data to provide a reason and compel people to take the vaccine is a crime against humanity.<\/p>\n Rather than silent all opposing voices, questions about the short-term and long-term safety of the largest drug trial in history need to be answered. If people are going to be compelled to take the coronavirus vaccine, they have the right to know what the side effects are and the actual risk of death from the vaccine. People have the right to ask governments questions without being censored and silenced.<\/p>\n We must all stand up to defend our rights to accurate data. We must resist any attempt by any government to hide crucial information from us. Government agencies and health officials owe us a duty to transparency and accurate data so we can make informed decisions about our health!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Writes Zeus, Content Writer, Headline Diplomat eMagazine The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020, and on November 09, 2020, Pfizer and Biontech announced that the first set of results from their Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trial provided the initial evidence of our vaccine\u2019s ability to prevent COVID-19. Following that announcement, the US …<\/p>\nCOVID vaccine-related deaths in the US<\/strong><\/h4>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\nReports from other countries<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Why are the governments COVID vaccine apologists?<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Featured Photo by \u00a0Alena Shekhovtcova, <\/a>Pexels<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/h6>\n