{"id":2663,"date":"2022-01-31T06:35:19","date_gmt":"2022-01-31T03:35:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ludci.eu\/magazine\/?p=2663"},"modified":"2022-02-24T09:28:34","modified_gmt":"2022-02-24T06:28:34","slug":"why-eus-anti-innovation-rules-should-be-severely-attacked","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ludci.eu\/magazine\/why-eus-anti-innovation-rules-should-be-severely-attacked\/","title":{"rendered":"Why EU’s Anti-innovation Rules should be severely attacked"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Written by Althea, Content Writer, Headline Diplomat eMagazine
\nDyson won a long-running EU court case over how vacuum cleaners' energy usage is labeled, calling it a \"victory for customers.\"<\/p>\n

The government inabilities deceive people, creates uncertainty, eliminates jobs, and is a disguised trade barrier erected by the European Union \u2014 on top of the 6% tax we pay to import into the EU. In their long but eventually victorious legal struggle against the EU's defective energy labeling rule, which unlawfully misinformed many customers, Dyson has seen this personally throughout the last seven years.<\/p>\n

The trial has cast doubt on the dark arts of European corruption, as well as the complexities of EU regulation. It is now in its final act. Dyson has actually won in court to have the legislation repealed in its totality, and now the European General Court will decide whether or not this will be brought to court.<\/p>\n

The proposed law may appear harmless to most of the population. According to the European directive, every vacuum cleaner sold in Europe must have a brand name that indicates how fuel-efficient the machine is and assists in reducing energy use. In principle, this is a smart...<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

To read the whole article, please subscribe here<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n