LUDCI Magazine

  • Home
  • Ludci.eu
  • Headline Diplomat eMagazine
  • Submit Your News Article
  • Contact us
You are at :Home»Paid Articles»COVID-19 Testing: Are PCR Tests Reliable?

COVID-19 Testing: Are PCR Tests Reliable?

LUDCI.eu Editorial Team 10 Nov 2020 Paid Articles 2720 Views

Writes Zeus, Headline Diplomat eMagazine, LUDCI.eu

To say the coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis has severely dealt with the world over the last 10 months would be stating the obvious. Personal lives have been disrupted, families and loved ones separated, businesses crashed, and jobs lost, all because of an infection that is no more than seasonal flu. The truth is, our normal lives have been psychologically, mentally, economically, socially, and morally disrupted.

Reports are beginning to question the validity of the PCR test as flawed and cannot be trusted. The science behind testing COVID-19, specifically using the PCR test is not reasonable and quite misleading, leading to scandalous actions by the governments.

The so-called coronavirus pandemic was no more deadly than the usual seasonal flu, yet the measures taken by the governments to curb the spread of the virus was like nothing we had ever seen. In fact, the measures, and not the coronavirus, have shattered lives, caused more deaths, and destroyed many businesses across the world.

We must ask ourselves the important questions: Is the coronavirus as dangerous as it is claimed to be? How reliable is the PCR test for coronavirus, and what exactly does a positive test mean? To address the first question, we need to look at the swine flu pandemic that happened more than a decade ago.

Swine Flu and the Failed Attempt at Creating a Pandemic Crisis

In 2009, the World Health Organization (W.H.O), assisted by many scientists and pharmaceutical companies, declared the N1H1 influenza virus (swine flu) a pandemic. They claimed that the virus would kill millions of people and that the world needed a vaccine urgently. As usual, the pharmaceutical companies made billions of dollars from vaccine sales. But in the end, the vaccine proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine flu eventually turned out to be a mild flu, against the predictions of these pharmaceutical companies and their enablers. These vaccines even resulted in serious health problems, resulting in about 700 children in Europe falling incurably ill with narcolepsy and permanently becoming disabled.

Using the same panic-generation model, some scientists and other tech experts seemed to have teamed up with the W.H.O, to sell another pandemic to the world – only that this time, they took it to an apocalyptic level. Supported by the two largest health funds – the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Welcome Trust – these people forced the coronavirus pandemic narrative down our throats. To make their case, they bastardized the science of disease diagnosis and misused the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test to generate so many positive results to prove mass infections, to push their ultimate agenda – mass vaccination. Unfortunately, the mass panic they created with the numbers they were churning out from their deliberate misuse of the PCR technology led many governments to initiate unprecedented control measures, such as the mandatory face masks, social distancing, and a complete lockdown of movements, which not only infringed on our rights but also caused a lot of economic hardship.

How the PCR test is misused to indicate high COVID-19 infection rate

First, it is important to mention here that COVID-19, just like the seasonal flu, is a dangerous disease that might result in complications and sometimes death. However, they have misused the PCR test to up the infection rates in a way that suits their narrative. Just like most rapid test methods, the PCR test can give false-positive results, and if not properly done, the number of false-positive results can be significantly high, which appears to be the case in this pandemic, and here is how:

The PCR test, whether it is for COVID-19 or any other virus, works by amplifying a unique sequence in the organism’s genome to a level where it can be detected with specific means of identification. It is a very sensitive test, such that the tiniest piece of the organism’s genome can be amplified and identified. But the thing about high sensitivity is that, without adequate precaution, there will be high numbers of false-positive results.

For the coronavirus PCR test, false-positive results can come from two ways – background contamination of the testing kit or previous exposure to the virus or even a similar virus. The former may be ruled out by confirming the quality of the test kits, but what about the latter? Many people who test positive might not have an active infection. The test only shows that a fragment of the COVID-19 virus was detected, but those could have been from dead viruses, which is why the so-called second wave of the infection may be a false alarm as most of those people who test positive might have recovered from a previous infection during the first wave.

Talking of the first wave, the coronavirus PCR kit developed by Professor Christian Drosten and his team in Germany was not even based on the COVID-19 virus. He used the genome of the SARS virus that caused the 2002/2003 epidemic in China because of its similarity with the current coronavirus. Hence, the authenticity of the results from those kits is questionable. But what is even more worrying is that he made it a qualitative test, which shows either a positive or negative result without telling the doctor what the viral load is like in the patient.

Normally, the number of cycles required to amplify the viral genome for identification can be used to estimate the viral load in the patient – the higher the number of cycles, the lower the viral load. An appropriate test should tell the doctor at what cycle the virus was detected. But Drosten’s PCR test kits don’t tell you that. Instead, the kits are fixed at 45 cycles, while the standard acceptable cycles for PCR tests for other viruses is 35 or less. The implication is a hypersensitive – and unreliable – kit that can give a positive result even when there is no live COVID-19 virus present.

Several highly respected scientists worldwide, including Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt of Stanford University, has raised concerns about the unscientific and dubious nature of the PCR test, with many saying what we have is not a coronavirus pandemic but a PCR test pandemic. One of the recent comments of this scandal was made by Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, in a paper published in September 2020. ‘If it weren’t for the test results that are constantly reported in the media, the pandemic would be over, because nothing happened,’ Mr. Yeadon stated in a corresponding article. In the same article, Mr. Yeadon further stated that ‘the likelihood of a positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent or near certainty.’ This, he stated in agreement with professors of immunology and microbiology from Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, and Austria. Even the so-called second wave of infection might be fake, according to Mr. Yeadon.

Furthermore, Oxford Professor, Carl Henegan, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, has said that the COVID-19 virus would never disappear if the test practice were to be continued. This is because it would always be falsely detected in much of what is tested. Indeed, we have been misled, and this calls for us to take action on this crime against humanity.

The need for a class-action lawsuit

The imposed pandemic has affected and shattered many lives. Millions of people have died as a result of the erroneous use of ventilators instead of simple oxygen masks. Small and Medium-scale businesses that are often the backbone of the economy have been rendered bankrupt. Some people have been shot for violating lockdown measures. Many have been thrown in jails. Suicides have increased. Thousands of children have been taken away from their parents. Many people have lost their jobs. Many have died from forceful enforcement of coronavirus lockdown measures. A lot of people have developed serious health issues through the use of nose masks. Even our democracy has been in danger of being taken over by fascist authoritarians, as people’s constitutional rights are being encroached. All these just to curb a virus that has been shown to not the more than the normal seasonal flu!

All these happened because these scientists presented false facts concerning the PCR tests, intentionally manipulated their way until a false pandemic was declared. This is a fraud and a crime against humanity, as defined in article 7 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court. This requires that action be taken against the people behind this fraud. It calls for a class-action lawsuit, as it was done in the Nuremberg disaster. All the people who have been harmed by these PCR tests and the PCR test-induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses. This action has already been started in Germany by the German Investigative Committee.

Conclusion:

The PCR test upon which the declaration of the coronavirus pandemic is based is an invalid one. Still, the fallouts from the pandemic have been huge on all fronts. Staying healthy is one thing. Preventing more people from getting sick is important. But using a health situation and fake numbers to give new powers to governments and succumbing to fascism and dictatorship is a much different story that we cannot possibly agree.

Featured photo by Korhan Erdol, Pexels

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Bill Gates Foundation Christian Drosten Covid19 mass vaccination misused powers PCR Tests seasonal flu W.H.O. Welcome Trust 2020-11-10
LUDCI.eu Editorial Team
Tags Bill Gates Foundation Christian Drosten Covid19 mass vaccination misused powers PCR Tests seasonal flu W.H.O. Welcome Trust

Related Articles

Covid-19 and Its Impact on the Healthcare System

Covid-19 and Its Impact on the Healthcare System

LUDCI.eu Editorial Team 16 Sep 2020
Children at the mercy of drug cartels

Children at the mercy of drug cartels

LUDCI.eu Editorial Team 03 Dec 2020
Why COVID-19 feels like a forced siege? A Greek perspective

Why COVID-19 feels like a forced siege? A Greek perspective

LUDCI.eu Editorial Team 02 Oct 2020

Article Countdown

  • September 2026 (2)
  • August 2026 (3)
  • July 2026 (3)
  • June 2026 (3)
  • May 2026 (3)
  • April 2026 (5)
  • March 2026 (4)
  • February 2026 (2)
  • January 2026 (4)
  • December 2025 (3)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (4)
  • September 2025 (4)
  • July 2025 (4)
  • June 2025 (3)
  • May 2025 (4)
  • April 2025 (3)
  • March 2025 (6)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (4)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (3)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (2)
  • July 2024 (3)
  • June 2024 (6)
  • May 2024 (9)
  • April 2024 (6)
  • March 2024 (10)
  • February 2024 (5)
  • January 2024 (9)
  • December 2023 (10)
  • November 2023 (6)
  • October 2023 (7)
  • September 2023 (4)
  • August 2023 (5)
  • July 2023 (5)
  • June 2023 (8)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (4)
  • March 2023 (6)
  • February 2023 (6)
  • January 2023 (2)
  • December 2022 (5)
  • October 2022 (2)
  • September 2022 (4)
  • August 2022 (3)
  • July 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (3)
  • May 2022 (1)
  • April 2022 (5)
  • March 2022 (8)
  • February 2022 (4)
  • January 2022 (5)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • June 2021 (6)
  • May 2021 (6)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • March 2021 (5)
  • February 2021 (3)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (9)
  • November 2020 (9)
  • October 2020 (17)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (11)


Total Articles: 359

Menu

Home

About Us

eMagazine

Services

Menu

Book Our Services

Courses

LUDCI Foundation

Reach & Donate

Social Media

Facebook X Instagram LinkedIn YouTube

Send us an email at info@ludci.eu

Call for Proposals

Call for Proposals
Copyright © 2026 Luxembourg's Diplomacy and Communications Institute SaRL (LUDCI.eu). All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction, transmission, or alteration of any material is prohibited without prior written permission. For inquiries, please contact us.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag(\'js\', new Date()); gtag(\'config\', \'UA-168083100-2\');
SAVE & ACCEPT